FierceMobile seems to be on a kick these last few days indicating that consumers will be confused by all of the applications available to them. Sue Marek went suggested that carriers set up their application stores and keep their policy of only carrying applications that they have tested and approve of themselves. (Click here to read the story.)
While there is certainly some rationale behind this thought, with 25,000 applications for the iPhone, who can tell what is good and what is garbage at first blush? However, I am a firm believer that there are very few business models and channels that are truly new – just variations of something we have seen before. This allows for us to learn from history (or other market places) and apply those lessons here.
First, lets look at the history of mobile applications. Carriers have proven in the past that they do not have the resources or processes to foster a vibrant application ecosystem. Before the iPhone, how many mobile phone subscribers actually downloaded an application to their phone? Why? There were no really good applications to download and the price points were out of alignment to the value provided. Because of restrictive carrier policies, there was no good way to modify application pricing plans without a lot of new contracts and negotiations.
We can also look at other industries to see how they have tackled comparing products on-line before purchase. If we look at shareware, applications written by independent developers. Pricing models are either free, ask for donations to the project, or pay money for an unlock code that will unlock the application after a trial period. Hmmm, sound familiar… There, users provide ratings for applications and users can easily search for applications and sort based on user reviews and number of downloads. Good applications quickly rise to the top. I buy a lot of items from Amazon.com precisely because of the user reviews.
Sue does point out that carriers typically have the more recognized brands in the mobile space. Subscribers necessarily have the relationship with carriers and they can provide clarity for consumers on certain applications. Certainly any application that itself can access your billing or demographic information from the carrier records should be approved by the carrier. I think there is also a place for sponsored applications just as consumer products pay slotting fees in retail stores. However, they should not restrict applications as they do now.
I do agree with Andrew Seybold’s suggestion that application developers provide free trials of their software to consumers. This will help encourage trial, and if they have developed a good application, spur purchase. Applications that allow trial on a PC such as mPowerPlayer are even better and should be common for all mobile application stores.
Over time, application stores that allow for easier searching and user reviews will rise to the top and others will go away. Just like on the Internet, Amazon rules and no one remembers Buy.com…